<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL reserved words, Google SHOW *_STATISTICS patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openquery.com/blog/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openquery.com/blog/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch</link>
	<description>About MySQL, Drizzle, MariaDB and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week in OurDelta - Vol 1 &#171; Open Query blog</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch/comment-page-1#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>This week in OurDelta - Vol 1 &#171; Open Query blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blogs/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch#comment-949</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed. It&#8217;s nothing major but, for instance, we don&#8217;t want patches to create any new reserved words as that can break existing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed. It&#8217;s nothing major but, for instance, we don&#8217;t want patches to create any new reserved words as that can break existing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjen</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch/comment-page-1#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>arjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blogs/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Looking at it, thanks!
It&#039;ll require a few modifications to blend with the Google userstatsv2 patch as they both introduce new REFRESH_ macros. No big deal.
And we&#039;ll want to port it back to 5.0, also shouldn&#039;t be a problem by the looks of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at it, thanks!<br />
It&#8217;ll require a few modifications to blend with the Google userstatsv2 patch as they both introduce new REFRESH_ macros. No big deal.<br />
And we&#8217;ll want to port it back to 5.0, also shouldn&#8217;t be a problem by the looks of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch/comment-page-1#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blogs/mysql-reserved-words-google-show-_statistics-patch#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I have a patch that splits up all of the flush logs functionality into separate flush commands. It may be more complete to include it instead of one that only splits up flush slow query logs. See:

http://ebergen.net/wordpress/2008/05/19/splitting-flush-logs-command/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a patch that splits up all of the flush logs functionality into separate flush commands. It may be more complete to include it instead of one that only splits up flush slow query logs. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://ebergen.net/wordpress/2008/05/19/splitting-flush-logs-command/" rel="nofollow">http://ebergen.net/wordpress/2008/05/19/splitting-flush-logs-command/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
