<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to do with the Falcon engine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openquery.com/blog/falcon-engine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openquery.com/blog/falcon-engine</link>
	<description>About MySQL, Drizzle, MariaDB and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjen</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/falcon-engine/comment-page-1#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>arjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 03:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blog/?p=738#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>My point has been for a while, getting it available as a pluggable for 5.1 would make it way more likely that people will test it - and provide more feedback. I think this is an excellent opportunity to make it so, as there clearly is no product-development reasoning any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point has been for a while, getting it available as a pluggable for 5.1 would make it way more likely that people will test it &#8211; and provide more feedback. I think this is an excellent opportunity to make it so, as there clearly is no product-development reasoning any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/falcon-engine/comment-page-1#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blog/?p=738#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>:-)

But they have Philip now ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://openquery.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But they have Philip now &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony T Curtis</title>
		<link>http://openquery.com/blog/falcon-engine/comment-page-1#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony T Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openquery.com/blog/?p=738#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>AFAIK, there is no intrinsic reason why Falcon must be on 6.0 and so a Falcon for 5.1 would be a good move.

Right now, Falcon&#039;s biggest problems is stability. Once they have fixed the crashing bugs, people could then seriously start testing it.

Falcon&#039;s sad loss is Hakan&#039;s excellent diligence in testing but I am sure we shall see him again soon, testing other storage engines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK, there is no intrinsic reason why Falcon must be on 6.0 and so a Falcon for 5.1 would be a good move.</p>
<p>Right now, Falcon&#8217;s biggest problems is stability. Once they have fixed the crashing bugs, people could then seriously start testing it.</p>
<p>Falcon&#8217;s sad loss is Hakan&#8217;s excellent diligence in testing but I am sure we shall see him again soon, testing other storage engines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
